2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chrysler 200 (283 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chrysler 200 (352 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (332 Nm). This means 2011 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
| Model | ESX 3 | 200 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 283 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 352 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4948 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2766 mm |
