2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2011 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2011 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Peugeot RCZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot RCZ (163 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 has automatic transmission and 2011 Peugeot RCZ has manual transmission. 2011 Peugeot RCZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2011 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Chrysler | Peugeot |
Model | ESX 3 | RCZ |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 163 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1359 mm |