2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2012 Audi S3
To start off, 2012 Audi S3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi S3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi S3 (261 HP) has 187 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi S3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.
Because 2012 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 has automatic transmission and 2012 Audi S3 has manual transmission. 2012 Audi S3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2012 Audi S3 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Audi |
| Model | ESX 3 | S3 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 261 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
