2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2012 Cadillac SRX

To start off, 2012 Cadillac SRX is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac SRX (308 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 320 kg more than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (332 Nm). This means 2012 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chrysler ESX 3 2012 Cadillac SRX
Make Chrysler Cadillac
Model ESX 3 SRX
Year Released 2000 2012
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1499 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 74 HP 308 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 332 Nm 359 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1940 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4834 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1669 mm
Wheelbase Size 3000 mm 2807 mm