2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (74 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 has automatic transmission and 2012 Nissan Pixo has manual transmission. 2012 Nissan Pixo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | ESX 3 | Pixo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 68 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2360 mm |