2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1964 Willys-Overland Aero
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Willys-Overland Aero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Willys-Overland Aero would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Willys-Overland Aero is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Willys-Overland Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Willys-Overland Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1964 Willys-Overland Aero | |
Make | Chrysler | Willys-Overland |
Model | Grand Voyager | Aero |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 2638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2740 mm |