2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1984 Honda HP-X
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Honda HP-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Honda HP-X would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Honda HP-X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 550 kg more than 1984 Honda HP-X.
Because 1984 Honda HP-X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Honda HP-X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Honda HP-X has automatic transmission and 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager has manual transmission. 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Honda HP-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1984 Honda HP-X | |
| Make | Chrysler | Honda |
| Model | Grand Voyager | HP-X |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 3001 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1155 kg |
