2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2006 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer (293 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer (407 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (227 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2006 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | Grand Voyager | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 293 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 227 Nm | 407 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2890 mm |