2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2011 Tata Indica
To start off, 2011 Tata Indica is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2011 Tata Indica. (70 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2011 Tata Indica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 660 kg more than 2011 Tata Indica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager (227 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Tata Indica. (135 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Tata Indica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2011 Tata Indica | |
| Make | Chrysler | Tata |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Indica |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 227 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2410 mm |
