2000 Chrysler Howler vs. 1960 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Howler is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Howler weights approximately 480 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Howler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Howler | 1960 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Howler | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2710 mm |
