2000 Chrysler Howler vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Howler is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Howler. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Howler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 275 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Howler. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Howler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Howler | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Howler | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 40 L |