2000 Chrysler Howler vs. 1963 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Howler is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Howler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Howler weights approximately 295 kg more than 1963 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 1963 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Howler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Howler | 1963 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Chrysler | Plymouth |
Model | Howler | Valiant |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 3689 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |