2000 Chrysler Howler vs. 1967 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Howler is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Howler (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Cougar. (137 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Howler should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Howler weights approximately 200 kg more than 1967 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Howler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Howler | 1967 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | Howler | Cougar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 4940 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2830 mm |