2000 Chrysler Howler vs. 1975 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Howler is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Howler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Howler weights approximately 550 kg more than 1975 Lotus Eclat.
Because 1975 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Howler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Howler | 1975 Lotus Eclat | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | Howler | Eclat |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2490 mm |
