2000 Chrysler Howler vs. 1996 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Howler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Howler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 20 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Howler.
Because 1996 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Howler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Howler | 1996 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | Howler | Cougar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 3798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1860 mm |