2000 Chrysler Howler vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Howler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Howler would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Howler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (256 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Howler. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Howler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Howler weights approximately 175 kg more than 2004 Volvo S60.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Howler (408 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo S60. (340 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler Howler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Howler | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Howler | S60 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 2524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 340 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 70 L |