2000 Chrysler Howler vs. 2008 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Howler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Howler would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Howler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Howler (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2008 Volkswagen Eos. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Howler should accelerate faster than 2008 Volkswagen Eos.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Howler (408 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen Eos. (281 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler Howler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen Eos.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Howler | 2008 Volkswagen Eos | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volkswagen |
| Model | Howler | Eos |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 55 L |
