2000 Chrysler Howler vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Howler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Howler would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Howler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Howler (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Howler should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Howler weights approximately 50 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Howler (408 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler Howler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Howler | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Howler | 6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 2486 cc |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 228 Nm |
Top Speed | 207 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 64 L |