2000 Chrysler Java vs. 1966 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Java is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Falcon (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 1966 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Java | 1966 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Java | Falcon |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 2782 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |