2000 Chrysler Java vs. 1966 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Java is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 1966 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1966 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 2000 Chrysler Java has manual transmission. 2000 Chrysler Java will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1966 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Java | 1966 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Java | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 6385 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
