2000 Chrysler Java vs. 1968 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Java is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,948 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford GT 40 (424 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 343 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 1968 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Java | 1968 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Java | GT 40 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 4948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 424 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 980 mm |