2000 Chrysler Java vs. 1976 Zastava 132
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Java is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Zastava 132 (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 1976 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Java | 1976 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Zastava |
| Model | Java | 132 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
