2000 Chrysler Java vs. 1980 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Java is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1980 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mazda RX-7 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 1980 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Java | 1980 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Java | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1270 mm |
