2000 Chrysler Java vs. 1980 Volvo 240
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Java is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 240 (152 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 1980 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Java | 1980 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Java | 240 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1470 mm |
