2000 Chrysler Java vs. 1983 Fiat Campagnola

To start off, 2000 Chrysler Java is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Java (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Campagnola. (79 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Campagnola.

Because 1983 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Java. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chrysler Java 1983 Fiat Campagnola
Make Chrysler Fiat
Model Java Campagnola
Year Released 2000 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1397 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 81 HP 79 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Length 3780 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1960 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]