2000 Chrysler Java vs. 1983 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Java is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Mustang (88 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 1983 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Java | 1983 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Java | Mustang |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 2294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1320 mm |