2000 Chrysler Java vs. 1984 Ford GT
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Java is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford GT would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford GT (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford GT should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 1984 Ford GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Ford GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Java | 1984 Ford GT | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Java | GT |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1330 mm |