2000 Chrysler Java vs. 1984 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Java is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Holden Commodore (115 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 1984 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Holden Commodore has automatic transmission and 2000 Chrysler Java has manual transmission. 2000 Chrysler Java will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Holden Commodore will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Java | 1984 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Java | Commodore |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 3298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1390 mm |