2000 Chrysler Java vs. 1988 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Java is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1988 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1988 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Java | 1988 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | Java | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1988 |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1910 mm |
