2000 Chrysler Java vs. 1998 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Java is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Java is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Java | 1998 Ford Puma | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Java | Puma |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1350 mm |