2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2001 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.

Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Java. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chrysler Java 2001 Ford Ranger
Make Chrysler Ford
Model Java Ranger
Year Released 2000 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1397 cc 2497 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 81 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Length 3780 mm 5090 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1750 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]