2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Java is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Java (81 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Java | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Chrysler | MCC |
Model | Java | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1520 mm |