2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Java. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2000 Chrysler Java has manual transmission. 2000 Chrysler Java will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Java | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
Model | Java | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1870 mm |