2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (385 HP) has 304 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Java. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Java | 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | Java | Range Rover Sport |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 4197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 385 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
