2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Java is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Java (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Java | 2009 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Chrysler | Tata |
| Model | Java | Nano |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1652 mm |
