2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2010 BMW X6
To start off, 2010 BMW X6 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 BMW X6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW X6 (304 HP @ 440 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 2010 BMW X6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Java. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 BMW X6 has automatic transmission and 2000 Chrysler Java has manual transmission. 2000 Chrysler Java will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 BMW X6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Java | 2010 BMW X6 | |
| Make | Chrysler | BMW |
| Model | Java | X6 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 304 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 440 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1983 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1690 mm |
