2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 197 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2000 Chrysler Java has manual transmission. 2000 Chrysler Java will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Java | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Java | Calais |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 278 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |