2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 2000 Chrysler Java has manual transmission. 2000 Chrysler Java will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Java | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Java | 3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1471 mm |