2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (141 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.

Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Java. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chrysler Java 2012 Mazda BT-50
Make Chrysler Mazda
Model Java BT-50
Year Released 2000 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1397 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 81 HP 141 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Length 3780 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1750 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]