2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC90 (200 HP) has 119 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Java. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Java | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Java | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1897 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1783 mm |
