2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2013 Audi A6
To start off, 2013 Audi A6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Audi A6 (208 HP) has 127 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 2013 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Java. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Java | 2013 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Audi |
| Model | Java | A6 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4925 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2086 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1468 mm |
