2000 Chrysler Java vs. 2013 BMW X6 M
To start off, 2013 BMW X6 M is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 4,395 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW X6 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X6 M (547 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 466 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X6 M should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 2013 BMW X6 M is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Java. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X6 M will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 BMW X6 M has automatic transmission and 2000 Chrysler Java has manual transmission. 2000 Chrysler Java will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 BMW X6 M will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Java | 2013 BMW X6 M | |
Make | Chrysler | BMW |
Model | Java | X6 M |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 4395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 547 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4876 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2195 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1684 mm |