2000 Chrysler LHS vs. 1951 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2000 Chrysler LHS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler LHS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler LHS (246 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler LHS should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler LHS weights approximately 345 kg more than 1951 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler LHS (327 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler LHS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler LHS | 1951 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
| Model | LHS | Renown |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 2088 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 246 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 327 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 1284 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2750 mm |
