2000 Chrysler LHS vs. 1952 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2000 Chrysler LHS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler LHS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler LHS (246 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler LHS should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 1952 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler LHS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler LHS has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1952 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler LHS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler LHS | 1952 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | LHS | 12 M |
Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 246 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2500 mm |