2000 Chrysler LHS vs. 1955 Talbot T 26

To start off, 2000 Chrysler LHS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler LHS (246 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1955 Talbot T 26. (197 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler LHS should accelerate faster than 1955 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler LHS weights approximately 19 kg more than 1955 Talbot T 26. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1955 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler LHS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler LHS has automatic transmission and 1955 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1955 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler LHS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: