2000 Chrysler LHS vs. 1962 Lancia Flavia
To start off, 2000 Chrysler LHS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler LHS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler LHS (246 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1962 Lancia Flavia. (101 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler LHS should accelerate faster than 1962 Lancia Flavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler LHS weights approximately 479 kg more than 1962 Lancia Flavia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler LHS | 1962 Lancia Flavia | |
Make | Chrysler | Lancia |
Model | LHS | Flavia |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 246 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 42 L |