2000 Chrysler LHS vs. 1965 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Chrysler LHS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler LHS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler LHS (246 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler LHS should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler LHS weights approximately 519 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler LHS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler LHS | 1965 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Chrysler | DKW |
| Model | LHS | Munga |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 246 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 31 L |
