2000 Chrysler LHS vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2000 Chrysler LHS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler LHS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler LHS (246 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler LHS should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler LHS weights approximately 963 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler LHS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler LHS | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Chrysler | DAF |
Model | LHS | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 246 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 33 L |