2000 Chrysler LHS vs. 1968 Holden Belmont

To start off, 2000 Chrysler LHS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler LHS (246 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (181 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler LHS should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler LHS weights approximately 329 kg more than 1968 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler LHS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (407 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler LHS. (327 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler LHS.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chrysler LHS 1968 Holden Belmont
Make Chrysler Holden
Model LHS Belmont
Year Released 2000 1968
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3518 cc 5025 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 246 HP 181 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 327 Nm 407 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1629 kg 1300 kg
Vehicle Length 5290 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2830 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]