2000 Chrysler LHS vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2000 Chrysler LHS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler LHS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler LHS (246 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler LHS should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler LHS weights approximately 774 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler LHS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler LHS | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Chrysler | Zastava |
| Model | LHS | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 246 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2010 mm |
